A pull request modifies 14 files across a stock tracking module. When analyzing all files in a single pass,…

Question

A pull request modifies 14 files across a stock tracking module. When analyzing all files in a single pass, Claude provides superficial comments, misses obvious bugs, and produces contradictory feedback. How should you redesign the multi-pass review architecture to resolve this?

Accepted Answer

D. Split the review into focused passes: analyze each file individually for local issues, followed by a separate integration-focused pass for cross-file data flow.

Answer

A. Switch to a higher-tier model with a larger context window so all 14 files receive adequate attention in one pass.

Answer

B. Require developers to manually split large PRs into smaller submissions of 3-4 files before triggering the automated review.

Answer

C. Run three independent single-pass reviews on the full PR and only flag issues that achieve consensus across at least two runs.

Question 158