Question 197
Scenario: Claude Code for Continuous Integration
Claude Code runs headless inside a CI/CD pipeline: automated code reviews, test generation and pull-request feedback — with prompts designed for actionable findings and few false positives.
Read the full scenario lessonA team is building a code review system that generates reviews and then validates them. They notice that when the same Claude session generates code and then reviews it, the reviews are less critical than when a separate session performs the review. What architectural change would most effectively address this bias?